Last week I found what looks a homeotic mutant in my drosophila stocks. She had only one wing, with her head on the side of the thorax where the other wing should have been. She seemed otherwise healthy, and laid at least a couple of eggs, but unfortunately none survived.
20 December 2006
13 November 2006
The Dreaded Shrinks!
Here is a letter I sent recently to CBC news, in response to a disturbing article based around Bush's recent medical examination:
Your recent article 'shrinking through the ages' (www.cbc.ca/news/background/health/aging.html) erroneously portrays the loss of bone mass in elderly people as an inevitability of the human condition. In fact, reduction in bone mass can be primarily attributed to our modern diet, and is easily avoided, given sufficient knowledge. There are four related features of a typical modern diet which together contribute to loss of bone mass:
Low dietary mineral content:
Foods traditionally valued for outstanding mineral content, such as organ meats and bone broths, are rarely consumed by the average modern Canadian. Fresh milk from healthy grass-fed cows, once the primary daily source of minerals, has been replaced by milk from cows fed a grain-based diet, and bred to produce high quantity but not high quality milk, from which the already poor mineral content is further depleted through intensive processing. Mineral-rich butter from grass-fed cows has largely been replaced by processed vegetable oils. Sea salt, with a large and balanced spectrum of trace elements, has given way to refined sodium chloride. The vegetables which once provided a significant contribution to our mineral intake are now likely to be grown in soils depleted of nutrients, thanks to industrial scale monocropping agricultural practices.
Low intake of nutrients which promote mineral absorption:
Even if sufficient minerals are present in our diets, our bodies cannot absorb and utilize them correctly without the necessary cofactors: the fat soluble vitamins A and D, and cholesterol. Changes in our eating habits, fuelled to a large degree by an aggressive yet unfounded anti-cholesterol and anti-saturated fat campaign, have led to a drastic reduction in consumption of these necessary cofactors. Without eating high quality fresh whole milk dairy products and unprocessed animal fats, we are undoubtedly not absorbing a significant fraction of the minerals already present in our diets.
High intake of factors which inhibit mineral absorption:
The increasing consumption of carbohydrates in modern diets, without the traditional methods of preparation, has greatly increased our intake of 'anti-nutrients'. Soybeans and many grains contain phytic acid, which unless neutralized by fermenting, sprouting or soaking, will actively prevent absorption of minerals. Unfortunately, infants whose mothers can't or won't breast feed are instead given soy-based formula containing phytic acid, and so begin life with poor mineral supplies. The oxalic acid present in some leafy greens (which can be neutralized by cooking) and the tannins in black tea, have a similar effect on blocking mineral absorption.
High intake of foods that actively deplete mineral stores:
Metabolic acidosis is increasingly being recognized as a widespread result of poor modern diets, and as an underlying factor in many modern diseases, including osteoporosis. The pH balance of the body is shifted due to excessive intake of acidifying foods (such as refined carbohydrates and processed foods) and a deficit of alkalizing foods (those rich in minerals and antioxidants). In order to maintain the physiological blood pH of 7.4 (slightly alkaline), our bodies use as a buffer the mineral stocks in our bones. If those reserves are not continually replenished, metabolic acidosis occurs, with consequent loss of bone mass over time. The two worst offenders in the modern diet for contributing to metabolic acidosis are coffee and soft drinks, followed by most, if not all, processed and fast foods. To balance a diet that includes regular consumption of any of these culprits, an extremely high intake of minerals is required, otherwise the minerals in our bones are used as a buffer to prevent immediate damage to our bodies, resulting, of course, in the widespread phenomenon of shrinking through the ages.
Only by learning once again how to sustain ourselves on a diet of natural, carefully prepared, nutrient-dense foods, will we be able to maintaint our default healthy state throughout life, and 'the dreaded shrinks' can return to being merely a figment of Roald Dahl's imagination!
Further reading:
Weston A Price Foundation
Better Bones
The International Network of Cholesterol Sceptics
Your recent article 'shrinking through the ages' (www.cbc.ca/news/background/health/aging.html) erroneously portrays the loss of bone mass in elderly people as an inevitability of the human condition. In fact, reduction in bone mass can be primarily attributed to our modern diet, and is easily avoided, given sufficient knowledge. There are four related features of a typical modern diet which together contribute to loss of bone mass:
Low dietary mineral content:
Foods traditionally valued for outstanding mineral content, such as organ meats and bone broths, are rarely consumed by the average modern Canadian. Fresh milk from healthy grass-fed cows, once the primary daily source of minerals, has been replaced by milk from cows fed a grain-based diet, and bred to produce high quantity but not high quality milk, from which the already poor mineral content is further depleted through intensive processing. Mineral-rich butter from grass-fed cows has largely been replaced by processed vegetable oils. Sea salt, with a large and balanced spectrum of trace elements, has given way to refined sodium chloride. The vegetables which once provided a significant contribution to our mineral intake are now likely to be grown in soils depleted of nutrients, thanks to industrial scale monocropping agricultural practices.
Low intake of nutrients which promote mineral absorption:
Even if sufficient minerals are present in our diets, our bodies cannot absorb and utilize them correctly without the necessary cofactors: the fat soluble vitamins A and D, and cholesterol. Changes in our eating habits, fuelled to a large degree by an aggressive yet unfounded anti-cholesterol and anti-saturated fat campaign, have led to a drastic reduction in consumption of these necessary cofactors. Without eating high quality fresh whole milk dairy products and unprocessed animal fats, we are undoubtedly not absorbing a significant fraction of the minerals already present in our diets.
High intake of factors which inhibit mineral absorption:
The increasing consumption of carbohydrates in modern diets, without the traditional methods of preparation, has greatly increased our intake of 'anti-nutrients'. Soybeans and many grains contain phytic acid, which unless neutralized by fermenting, sprouting or soaking, will actively prevent absorption of minerals. Unfortunately, infants whose mothers can't or won't breast feed are instead given soy-based formula containing phytic acid, and so begin life with poor mineral supplies. The oxalic acid present in some leafy greens (which can be neutralized by cooking) and the tannins in black tea, have a similar effect on blocking mineral absorption.
High intake of foods that actively deplete mineral stores:
Metabolic acidosis is increasingly being recognized as a widespread result of poor modern diets, and as an underlying factor in many modern diseases, including osteoporosis. The pH balance of the body is shifted due to excessive intake of acidifying foods (such as refined carbohydrates and processed foods) and a deficit of alkalizing foods (those rich in minerals and antioxidants). In order to maintain the physiological blood pH of 7.4 (slightly alkaline), our bodies use as a buffer the mineral stocks in our bones. If those reserves are not continually replenished, metabolic acidosis occurs, with consequent loss of bone mass over time. The two worst offenders in the modern diet for contributing to metabolic acidosis are coffee and soft drinks, followed by most, if not all, processed and fast foods. To balance a diet that includes regular consumption of any of these culprits, an extremely high intake of minerals is required, otherwise the minerals in our bones are used as a buffer to prevent immediate damage to our bodies, resulting, of course, in the widespread phenomenon of shrinking through the ages.
Only by learning once again how to sustain ourselves on a diet of natural, carefully prepared, nutrient-dense foods, will we be able to maintaint our default healthy state throughout life, and 'the dreaded shrinks' can return to being merely a figment of Roald Dahl's imagination!
Further reading:
Weston A Price Foundation
Better Bones
The International Network of Cholesterol Sceptics
19 September 2006
21st century alchemy
A colleague asked me the other day what I thought was the raison d'etre of molecular biology. Though it had never occurred to me before, one possible answer was immediately clear: immortality.
The acknowledged goals of molecular biology are to cure disease, to live healthy into our old age, giving all members of our society an equal chance at a productive life, no matter what their genetic makeup; to engineer our food sources to provide what we naively think we need to improve our health. But what are the unspoken, and perhaps even unconscious driving forces? Is all this technology really an altruistic act on the part of we scientists to help those less fortunate?
Our scientific ancestors were the alchemists, whose ostensible pursuit was the transformation of materials, the quest for gold. But buried between the lines of alchemical texts, one finds the true underlying motivation: the transformation of the soul, the quest for eternal life.
Technology now in the hands of modern scientists is vastly more complex than that of our alchemical forefathers, but have our human desires really evolved in parallel with our means of investigation? Is this hugely complex undertaking we call molecular biology, now racing towards the generation of a human clone, simply the age-old pursuit of eternal life in a 21st century disguise?
The acknowledged goals of molecular biology are to cure disease, to live healthy into our old age, giving all members of our society an equal chance at a productive life, no matter what their genetic makeup; to engineer our food sources to provide what we naively think we need to improve our health. But what are the unspoken, and perhaps even unconscious driving forces? Is all this technology really an altruistic act on the part of we scientists to help those less fortunate?
Our scientific ancestors were the alchemists, whose ostensible pursuit was the transformation of materials, the quest for gold. But buried between the lines of alchemical texts, one finds the true underlying motivation: the transformation of the soul, the quest for eternal life.
Technology now in the hands of modern scientists is vastly more complex than that of our alchemical forefathers, but have our human desires really evolved in parallel with our means of investigation? Is this hugely complex undertaking we call molecular biology, now racing towards the generation of a human clone, simply the age-old pursuit of eternal life in a 21st century disguise?
Labels:
alchemy,
bioethics,
immortality,
molecular biology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)